Sunday 13th March, 2011
5:00pm to 6:00pm
There is a significant gap between intentions and outcomes related to pregnancy; young adults say overwhelmingly that while they don’t want to get pregnant right now, they also are not fully protecting themselves from pregnancy by the careful, consistent use of contraception.
This session is about a program designed to address that gap called Bedsider.
We’ll talk about why the gap exists and look at established theories of behavior change for ways to approach the problem.
We’ll denote a knowledge gap but offer that for most people, intentions are good. Sex is complicated, messy, emotional, and driven by desire. Yet most keep trying to attack the problem with logic. They speak like doctors, appeal to reason, and show pictures of smiling people who look like they’re about to buy a car.
This session will detail how to apply design thinking to the problem and re-frame birth control. For most, sex education usually comes at the wrong time, in the wrong context, in the wrong voice. How might a different tone and branding of birth control affect adherence? And how do you test for it in developing a program? We will address those questions in our session.
We’ll talk about how Bedsider has to fit in visually and verbally—it can’t look like the health department—and the role that language plays in attacking the excuses to not use birth control. In this session we’ll also address how to design for feedback in an area where “nothing” is the usual reward.
Using digital media for learning & behavior change and evaluating its effects is my gig. A maker of the @Bedsider program. http://bedsider.org
Sign in to add slides, notes or videos to this session