The promise of social communities on legacy media websites seemed bright at first. Ideally, communities on media websites inform journalists, have reasoned debate on issues, and add to the value of content on media websites. Or at least that's what was supposed to happen. Most legacy media companies have comments and communities, and many are let's just say less than accommodating to reasoned debate. We all know what I mean by that. How did this happen? Is it fixable? Should it be fixed? What are others doing to combat these problems? How does this conflict with first amendment values? On the other hand, many website communities exist without these problems. How did they manage to come into being? How do they stay civil? How do they continue to actually live up to the promise of informing journalism, having reasoned debate, and adding to content value? This panel will explore methods sites use to deal with nutjobs as well as how to encourage and reward productive members in the community.
The guy who runs Fark.com, the most popular comedy news website in the world bio from Twitter
Author of 'I Hope They Serve Beer In Hell,' 'Assholes Finish First,' 'Hilarity Ensues' and 'Sloppy Seconds' (free on iBooks/Kindle) bio from Twitter
Sign in to add slides, notes or videos to this session