Friday 22nd May, 2015
4:00pm to 4:50pm
One of the most important aspects of being a healthy skeptic is knowing that just because a scientific study was done on a topic does not mean that the study was done well, or that the conclusion the authors reached was supported by what they actually did. But when someone states that a particular study has major flaws or was well-done, what precisely does that mean? Join us as we analyze two different journal articles in detail, focusing on the good, the bad, and the ugly of how studies are done and interpreted.
Infectious Diseases physician at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore | PD of JHU/Sinai Internal Medicine residency program (back image CC BY-NC-ND Sanofi Pasteur) bio from Twitter
Sign in to add slides, notes or videos to this session